Is a 'rival' set of WW2 rules that is similar in scale to BF:WW2. As such, their scenarios are sources of ideas for BF and vice versa. Look on their downloads page. Submit your own scenarios We are actively soliciting new scenarios for the game. Share the wealth! To submit a scenario for use on this website, please send us the details of the scenario as follows: • Who you are (so we can give you credit) • Scenario Name • Description.
Understand the rules of language—how to spell and pronounce words and how to assemble and punctuate. Will increasingly be requested to perform retirements, promotions, commander's calls— opportunities where. O filetype: limits search to only those type files, such as filetype: pdf. The official site of Multi-Man Publishing, Inc. Blitzkrieg Commander (WW2 1936-45), Cold War Commander. Blitzkrieg Commander Rulebook Pdf To Jpg.
A brief description of the context of the scenario. If it is based on an historical action, give the date and location. Be sure to include map scale and name important locations.
• A complete list of the forces involved and their starting positions or arrival times. • Victory conditions for each side. • Game length and limitations. • Special scenario rules such as visibility restrictions, reinforcements, and air support availability. • A way that we can contact you if we have questions. When we get a new scenario, we will massage it into files that can be downloaded from this website and include it in the above table. If we find a really good one, we may ask your permission to publish it in an expansion rulebook and work out proper compensation.
You can send scenarios either by groundmail or email. If you have maps to send by email, attach them as.png,.gif, or.jpg. We can also scan in maps. Free Stuff Policy This page designed as a center for the free distribution of scenarios. Our payment policy is simple- We don't pay for contributions, but we don't charge for distributing them either!
If you send us something for inclusion on the site and we think it is appropriate, we will format it and give you full credit. Also, if we decide to use a contribution in a published supplement, we will work out proper compensation at that time. If you have something that you would like us to include, please let us know if you want us to include your contact information in the page (by default we will use only your name, but we can include an email address or URL if you want us to). Despite the fact that this information is distributed free, it is still protected by copyright. Our copyright policy can be found.
In May 1940, the Allied and German Armies squared off in what was expected to be an extended campaign for the conquest of France. Six weeks later, the victorious German Army marched down the Champs-Elysees in Paris. How was it that the Germans, with fewer tanks, fewer trucks, fewer troops, less artillery and access to roughly equivalent technologies, managed to accomplish such a remarkable feat? While leadership, luck, and a host of other factors were at play, the decisive factor was the remarkable way in which a few German inter-war military thinkers envisioned and developed a new way of warfare, known to the Allies as the blitzkrieg. German doctrine successfully integrated current technologies in aircraft, radios, and tanks into a coherent and integrated way of fighting and then applied it to great effect. The result was amplified because the Germans fought an enemy that in many cases failed to account for the possibilities enabled by the new combination of these technologies. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran Ganong Pdf. We are now on the cusp of a similar revolution in warfare with the opportunity to integrate several current and near term technologies into our concept of how we will conduct military operations in the not-to-distant future.
The winner of the next conflict will not likely be determined primarily by the state of their technologies, but by how well a nation’s military thinkers conceptualize future warfare in an integrated manner and then apply robotic systems, or warbots, appropriately to our way of fighting. For purposes of this discussion, warbots can be defined as robotic combat systems that can detect, identify, and apply lethal force to enemy combatants within prescribed parameters and without immediate human intervention. Using the historical lens of the blitzkrieg, we will examine two key trends that can help inform our concept of future warfare and our ability to wage it. They include: the rise of lethal warbots as primary combatants and adapting current leadership methods to a future era of manned-unmanned, or Centaur, teaming. The Rise of Lethal Warbots as Primary Combatants French armored doctrine used tanks to support slow moving infantry armies.
While generally armed with heavier guns and having thicker armor than most German tanks, they were also slower, rarely had radios to enable them to fight effectively in groups or to exploit rapidly changing battlefield conditions, and often had ineffectual one man turrets. In contrast, the Germans viewed their tanks as primary fighting vehicles that would spearhead deep attacks into the enemy’s rear as part of a combined arms team. The Germans consequently put a premium on balancing armor, firepower, maneuverability, and reliability. They also equipped most combat vehicles with radios to facilitate both effective maneuvering of large formations and rapid coordination with air assets. Most militaries continue to look at warbots as support weapons that can conduct reconnaissance, selective strike, and logistical or other supporting tasks. Many military leaders are most comfortable with warbots in these limited roles because it is easier to keep humans in the loop and therefore retain a greater feeling of control.